Beliefs

Belief does not trump reason, and can lead to shallow thinking, where opposing facts are filtered/distorted to enforce the original belief. Most people, as well as politicians, are good at it. However, as in science/logic, reason will generally prevail. Time fills in the factual holes and the story becomes more true or false. Not adjusting to facts, full on beliefs, ultimately, leads to conspiracy theories, religions, myths, fantasies, etc.

ALL THERE IS: Past papers or concepts that did not get enough attention.

ALL THERE IS: Past papers or concepts that did not get enough attention.

Past papers or concepts that did not get enough attention.

Here are some interesting links to some important past papers or concepts that did not get enough attention.

Uncountably many R⁴s, 4-space is indeed unique.
http://dictionary.sensagent.com/fake+r4/en-en/
Some apps in physics
http://iopscience.iop.org/0264-9381/18/16/319;jsessionid=1695FC8278156971901894C612EAB18E.c3

Unpredictability and undecidability in dynamical systems. I don't know why this didn't get more attention.
http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v64/i20/p2354_1
http://tuvalu.santafe.edu/~moore/nonlinearity-gs.pdf

The FAT Theorem. Fuzzy systems can also be used in physics to predict, but the trade off is the lack of understanding (although studying the rule patches that work can lead to understanding).
http://sipi.usc.edu/~kosko/FuzzyUniversalApprox.pdf

Bass's proof, only one consciousness assuming QM
http://www.fredalanwolf.com/myarticles/Bass_1.pdf

Free will theorem.
http://www.ams.org/notices/200902/rtx090200226p.pdf

The Shadow Theorem (illustrates how apparently random orbits may actually be the "shadows" of deterministic motions in higher dimensional spaces).
http://books.google.com/books?id=oh7NoePgmOIC&pg=PA156&lpg=PA156&dq=shadow+theorem+fractals&source=bl&ots=PgTeIJPCh2&sig=y_bm0nE30fujqtHM4eo96mbnwwI&hl=en&ei=39AoTYqiJo2asAPF0bTJCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBcQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=shadow%20theorem%20fractals&f=false

Ultimate-logic-to-infinity-and-beyond
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21128231-400-ultimate-logic-to-infinity-and-beyond/

ALL THERE IS: Why am I?

ALL THERE IS: Why am I?

To avoid a finite Heaven.

If we, as human beings, live in a quantum universe limited to Planck's constant, then the universe is finite and thus repeats. We can only have a finite number of different experiences each equating to a specific quantum state configuration of a certain size i.e. brain size, specific pattern of quantum states in the retina of the eyes, etc. The number of possible experiences is finite due the fact that replication occurs when identical pixel state patterns/quantum state patterns occur. A list of the quantum state patterns in a space region can be made: q1, q2, q3, ...qn, for a given space region. The space region can be expanded from brain size to the size of the universe, the results are the same but is takes considerably longer for replication to happen. The idea is the same as how many different pictures can be taken with a digital camera . If the camera has say 32 bits/pixel and has 10,000,000 pixels, then the total number of different pictures is 2^32^10,000,000. It is easy to create a bit add program to display all possible bit patterns on a computer but this will take a very long time!!!
The only way to truly experience an infinite set of experiences, is in a Heaven realm where each experience is actually infinite or our potential to experience is not limited by quantum state configuration. Thus in a Heaven realm we would have to have infinite thoughts, infinite sense input etc., in order to avoid having repeat experiences. Otherwise we are doomed to eternal recursion, even in the Heaven realm.

Why am I?

Why am I?
I am that I am for the Universe to be.
The Universe Is for I am.

I am the sum of my links

You can get a good idea about an individuals personality by examining their bookmarks, links et., stored on their computer. Good personality profiles can be generated by AI software processing the links.